The Shroud of Turin is Absolutely Authentic.
The
Shroud of Turin is a genuine relic, as well as the Holy House of
Nazareth in Loreto.
Studies
purporting to demonstrate that the Shroud is not genuine continue to
appear in the media and in journals. As recently as 2018 the Journal
of Forensic Sciences published the results of a study conducted on
the pattern of blood flow on the Shroud. They concluded the stains
were the result of multiple poses; rivulets on the back of the left
hand were made by a person whose arms were at a 45 degree angle, not
a vertical position, “while the stains at the back—of a supposed
postmortem
bleeding from the same wound for a supine corpse—are totally
unrealistic.” The scientists presented this paper at the Annual
Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences.
[Link.]
The NBC News website publicized the findings with this
spectacular headline: “Forensic research (once again) suggests the
Shroud of Turin is fake.” [Link.]
Fortunately
the Lord Himself has revealed the truth through the private
revelations contained in Maria Valtorta’s Notebooks.
Speaking
of Italy, Jesus
said to Maria: “Can you say that I have not loved this land, where
I have brought the relics of my life and my death; the house in
Nazareth where I was conceived in an embrace of luminous ardor
between the Divine Spirit and the Virgin, and the Shroud where the
sweat of my Death imprinted the sign of my pain, suffered for
humanity?” [July 22 1943.]
“O
Italy, Italy, to which I have given so much and which has forgotten
Me and forgotten my benefits! And from that Piedmont, where there is
a witness to God not inferior to that of the Mosaic Tabernacle –
for, if there were two tablets in it written by God’s prophet, here
there is the story of my Passion written with the ink of divine Blood
on the linen which mercy offered to cloak my nakedness as the
Immolated One. . . ” [October 23, 1943; Turin is the capital of
the Piedmont region in Italy; Turin’s Cathedral of Saint John the
Baptist is the resting place of the Holy Shroud.]
The
agonies of Christ on the cross were numerous, and one of the cruelest
was the agony of His hands. Were they pierced at the wrist or at the
palm? Actually it was both. The right hand was nailed through the
wrist, while on the left hand the nail went through the palm. On the
Holy Shroud only the wound on the right hand is visible, since the
right hand overlays the left hand.
On
December 29, 1943 the Lord explained the reason for this difference
to Maria Valtorta, as explained
in her Notebooks.
First, holes were made into the wood of the transverse beam where
the hands were to be nailed. The executioners intended to pierce the
Lord “. . . by the wrist joints, immediately above the carpus, to
make the attachment more secure.” This is where they pierced his
right hand. But when they extended his left arm, it would not reach
the hole on that side. Therefore the executioners forcibly stretched
his left arm to try make it reach the pre-made hole, but it would
still not reach it. The Lord told Maria, “. . . after having
stretched my arm to the point of producing the tearing of my tendons,
they decided to hammer the nail into the center of my palm, between
the bones of the metacarpus.”
Once
the cross was raised, and the weight of His body was shifted downward
and forward, the nail on the left palm
cut greatly towards the thumb, expanding the
wound
on that hand more
than the one on his right wrist. “And it was also the most
tormenting, both because it was on the side of the heart and because
the nail, on entering, broke the nerves and tendons in the hand,
causing an atrocious agony which spread to my head.”
A
few
artists and sculptors have, “out of a sense of art,” depicted
Jesus with his right hand open and the left hand partially closed.
They have, “. . . without so desiring, borne witness to a physical
truth of my martyred Body, for the left hand really closed into a
fist, both in agony and because of the breaking of the cut nerves. .
.” “My agonies on the cross were numerous . . . but this agony
of the hands was one of the cruelest.”
Maria
Valtorta’s description is remarkably consistent with those of other
mystics. Venerable Mary of Agreda, Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich,
and St. Bridget of Sweden all report that the Lord’s left arm was
violently extended to make it reach the hole in the wood of the
Cross. Yet, Valtorta had never read books concerning “revelations”
as she stated in her Autobiography.
View
my books Here.
I don't understand why holes were bored in the crossbeam to receive nails pinning the arms. It seems that it would not be a competent fixation
ReplyDeleteJudy, I believe the nails were very blunt. Probably used deliberately. St. Briget said that they intentionally made the holes far apart to increase His torments.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, the holes in the wood were drilled as far as possible from each other to ease the nailing of the wrists while in the same time both arms were pulled strongly to reach these predrilled holes, so that the weight of the body, once the cross was standing, inevitably dislocated the arms from their sockets causing a further intense and awful pain.
ReplyDelete