The Miraculous Birth of Our Lord
Is
the Holy Shroud a testimony of the Lord’s conception and birth, as
well as of His Passion and death? It seems so, for this is what He
told Maria Valtorta on May 20, 1949:
“My
Turin Shroud, O Maria, for whoever is able to see, is not just a
testimony that I truly died and rose again, but also testifies to the
way I was conceived and born, not according to the laws of humanity.
It is thus a confirmation of the truths that my Religion teaches: my
being conceived through the action of the Holy Spirit, the Divine
Maternity of Mary, her perpetual virginity, my passion and death, and
my glorious resurrection. But this is confirmation for those to whom
it is granted to see, in the light of God.” (The
Notebooks,
1945-1950; May 20, 1949, p. 524.)
My
attention to this Notebook
entry was aroused by the statements of Catholic author Bertolami Ugo
in his study entitled “The Shroud in the light of Maria Valtorta's
writings,” available at academia.edu Here.
After
presenting the above quote from Maria, Bertolami writes:
Now
to explain what Jesus means to refer to, I have reached the
conclusion (and not only I) that Jesus is referring to the
fact that the Shroud’s image lacks the mark of a navel, as can be
seen on
the crucifix of Msgr. Ricci and on the image of the Shroud’s
thorax. (Tamburelli, G. 1980.)
Adam,
in many Medieval paintings, is represented without a navel. Jesus was
born without injuring Our Lady’s virginity. This is confirmed many
times in Jesus’ dictations to Maria Valtorta and is confirmed by
the vision St. Bridget received. Correctly, Msgr. Ricci too, when
reconstructing the crucifix on the basis of the Shroud, did not put a
navel.
In
describing the birth of the Lord, Valtorta writes:
“The light is
given off more and more intensely from Mary’s body, it absorbs the
moonlight. She seems to be drawing to Herself all the light that can
descend from Heaven. She is now the Depository of the Light. She is
to give this light to the world. And this blissful, uncontainable,
immeasurable, eternal, divine Light which is about to be given, is
heralded by a dawn, a morning star, a chorus of atoms of Light that
increase continuously like a tide, and rise more and more like
incense, and descend like a large stream and stretch out like veils…”
“And
the light increases more and more. It is now unbearable to the eye.
And the Virgin disappears in so much light, as if She had been
absorbed by an incandescent curtain...and the Mother emerges. Yes.
When the light becomes endurable once again to my eyes, I see Mary
with the new-born Son in Her arms. A little Baby, rosy and plump,
bustling with His little hands as big as rose buds and kicking with
His tiny feet that could be contained in the hollow of the heart of a
rose: and is crying with a thin trembling voice, just like a new-born
little lamb, opening His pretty little mouth that resembles a wild
strawberry, and showing a tiny tongue that trembles against the rosy
roof of His mouth.” (Poem
of the Man-God,
Chap. 29 Vol. 1.)
In
order conform to Catholic teaching that Mary was a virgin before,
during and after the birth of Our Lord, He must have emerged from her
womb completely detached from any afterbirth matter, including the
umbilical cord. Such matter might have been retained within the womb
of His mother. As a sign of this miraculous detachment of His
umbilical cord and placenta, it seems, from the Shroud, that He was
born without a significantly visible navel. As He told Maria, the
Shroud testifies that He was born “not according to the laws of
humanity.”
Interestingly
enough, we have confirmation of these words of Jesus to the mystic
Maria Valtorta in the words of another mystic, Venerable Mary of
Agreda. She writes: "The infant God therefore was brought forth
from the virginal chamber unencumbered by any corporeal or material
substance foreign to Himself."
Quoting
Agreda:
“At
the end of the beatific rapture and vision of the Mother ever Virgin,
which I have described above was born the Sun of Justice, the Only
begotten of the eternal Father and of Mary most pure, beautiful,
refulgent and immaculate, leaving Her untouched in her virginal
integrity and purity and making Her more godlike and forever sacred;
for He did not divide, but penetrated the virginal chamber as the
rays of the sun penetrate the crystal shrine, lighting it up in
prismatic beauty. Before I describe the miraculous manner in which
this took place, I wish to say that the divine Child was born pure
and disengaged, without the protecting shield called secundina,
surrounded by which other children are commonly born, and in which
they are enveloped in the wombs of their mothers. […]
It
is
enough to know and suppose that in the generation and birth of the
incarnate Word the arm of the Almighty selected and made use of all
that substantially and unavoidably belonged to natural human
generation, so that the Word could truly call Himself conceived and
engendered as a true man and born of the substance of his Mother ever
Virgin.
“[...]
but it was consequent upon his miraculous Birth that He be exempt and
free from all that could be caused by the corruption or uncleanness
of matter. Thus also this covering, or secundina, was not to fall a
prey to corruption outside of the virginal womb, because it had been
so closely connected and attached to his most holy body and because
it was composed of the blood and substance of his Mother; in like
manner it was not advisable to keep and preserve it outside of Her,
nor was it becoming to give it the same privileges and importance as
to his divine body in coming forth from the body of his most holy
Mother,
as I will yet explain. The wonder which would have to be wrought to
dispose of that sacred covering outside of the womb could be wrought
much more appropriately within.
“The
infant God therefore was brought forth from the virginal chamber
unencumbered by any corporeal or material substance foreign to
Himself. But He came forth glorious and transfigured for the divine
and infinite wisdom decreed and ordained that the glory of his most
holy soul should in his Birth overflow and communicate itself to his
body, participating in the gifts of glory in the same way as happened
afterwards in his Transfiguration on mount Tabor in the presence of
the Apostles.” (Ven.
Mary of Agreda, The
Mystical City of God:
Volume
3,The Incarnation, nos. 477-479; Ave Maria Institute, 1971.)
Maria
Valtorta’s description that Jesus was born “in
a
chorus of atoms of Light” is seconded by another twentieth century
mystic, the Servant of God Luisa Piccarreta:
“...
I saw the Queen Mama in the act of giving birth to Little Baby Jesus.
What a wonderful prodigy! It seemed that both Mother and Son were
transmuted into most pure light. But in that light one could see very
well the human nature of Jesus containing the Divinity within Itself,
and serving as a veil to cover the Divinity; in such a way that, in
tearing the veil of human nature, He was God, while covered by that
veil, He was Man. Here is the prodigy of prodigies: God and Man, Man
and God! Without leaving the Father and the Holy Spirit – because
true love never separates
– He comes
to dwell in our midst, taking on human flesh. Now, it seemed to me
that Mother and Son, in that most happy instant, remained as though
spiritualized, and without the slightest difficulty Jesus came out of
the Maternal womb, while both of them overflowed with excess of Love.
In other words, those Most Pure Bodies were transformed into Light,
and without the slightest impediment, Light Jesus came out of the
Light of the Mother, while both One and the Other remained whole and
intact, returning, then, to their natural state.
“Who
can tell the beauty of the Little Baby who, at the moment of His
birth, transfused, also externally, the rays of the Divinity? Who can
tell the beauty of the Mother, who remained all absorbed in those
Divine rays? And Saint Joseph? It seemed to me that he was not
present at the act of the birth, but remained in another corner of
the cave, all engrossed in that profound Mystery. And if he did not
see with the eyes of the body, he saw very well with the eyes of the
soul, because he remained enraptured in sublime ecstasy.
“Now,
in the act in which the Little Baby came out to the light, I would
have wanted to fly and take Him in my arms, but the Angels prevented
me, saying that the honor of holding Him first belonged to the
Mother. Then, the Most Holy Virgin, as though stirred, returned into
Herself and from the hands of an Angel received Her Son in Her arms.
In Her ardor of love, She squeezed Him so tightly that it seemed that
She wanted to draw Him into Her womb again. Then, wanting to let Her
ardent love pour out, She placed Him at Her breast to suckle.”
(Luisa
Piccarreta, Book of Heaven, Volume 4, Dec. 25, 1900; available
online Here.)
View
my Catholic books Here.
The question about Jesus' navel remains open.
ReplyDeleteSaint Bridget of Sweden in her vision speaks of placenta and umbilical cord. The umbilical cord detached as soon as Maria touched it without blood coming out of it.
I don't think the Vatican are inclined to reopen this question.
Ugo Bertolami