Friday, March 7, 2025

Why the Vatican declaration on Maria Valtorta has no binding force.

 

The recent document from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), issued as a “press release,” makes the unsubstantiated claim that Maria Valtorta’s writings are simply “literary forms” used by the author, and are therefore not supernatural. However the DDF fails to provide any proof or documented facts that her works are just literature.


Further the DDF fails to provide any attempted refutation of the many proofs and documented facts that show that her works must be of supernatural origin.


Therefore the DDF press release can be described as the mere personal opinion of its author(s), since it lacks any supporting evidence. As such it has no binding force on anyone.


No human being, without divine inspiration, could have known so many facts that were presented for the very first time in The Gospel as Revealed to Me (written in the 1940’s), that have since proven to be true by scientists, geologists, Israeli archaeologists, astronomers, historians, ecologists, geographers, linguists and so on.


To dismiss off-hand in a few paragraphs the 15,000 pages written by a bed-ridden Roman Catholic victim soul is an insult to the possibly hundreds of thousands of Valtorta readers throughout the world.


This untruthful and false official Vatican declaration and judgment that Maria's works are not supernatural and divinely inspired, but are simply literature,  cannot go unchallenged. Therefore I hereby petition that this declaration be revoked.

 


DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH



Press Release

Regarding the Writings of Maria Valtorta

 

The Holy See frequently receives requests from both clergy and laity for a clarification about the Church’s position on the writings of Maria Valtorta, such as her work, Il poema dell’Uomo Dio (The Poem of the Man-God), now known by the title, L’Evangelo come mi è stato rivelato (The Gospel as Revealed to Me), and other publications.

 

It should be reiterated that alleged “visions”, “revelations,” and “messages” contained in the writings of Maria Valtorta—or, in any case, attributed to them—cannot be regarded as having a supernatural origin. Rather, they should be considered simply as literary forms that the author used to narrate the life of Jesus Christ in her own way.

 

In its long tradition, the Church does not accept as normative the Apocryphal Gospels and other similar texts since it does not recognize them as divinely inspired. Instead, the Church refers back to the sure reading of the inspired Gospels.

Vatican City, 22 February 2025



www.frankrega.com

 

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Vatican still gets it wrong about Maria Valtorta’s works!

 

In the latest statement from the Vatican, dated February 22, 2025, the Dicastery for Doctrine of the Faith declares that Maria Valtorta’s The Gospel as Revealed to Me cannot be considered of supernatural origin, but is rather is simply a literary work by the author. This is the same work that was once entitled The Poem of the Man-God.


(The statement comes from the Dicastery that also issued Fiducia Supplicans, which has been interpreted in practice as the blessing of same-sex relationships.)


At least it is a step forward compared to the Vatican’s placing The Poem of the Man-God on the now defunct Index of Forbidden Books in 1960 for being published without an Imprimatur, and describing it then as a “badly fictionalized” life of Jesus.


Thus, while it is no longer condemned and forbidden to be read, according to the Dicastery, one can now safely read it as long as it is considered a mere literary creation. A tiny step forward. But the assertion that it “cannot be considered of supernatural origin” nor of “divine inspiration” is not entirely truthful. The part that is true is that the Vatican can make those considerations and judgments. The part that is false is the assertion that her work is not of supernatural origin and of divine inspiration.


In fact The Gospel as Reveled to Me is of divine inspiration, and was willed by the Lord to be written by Maria Valtorta. I have 100% human faith upon this belief. In her other works, when she specifies that certain revelations are from the Lord, the Father, the Holy Spirit, His Blessed Mother, various saints or angels, I also accept the truth of them. I have more faith in the writings of Maria Valtorta than in the writings of Dicasteries of the Vatican.

 

Therefore, I encourage people to read not only The Gospel as Revealed to Me, but the three “Notebooks” and the other works written by Maria Valtorta. In fact I consider her Notebooks to be only one tiny notch of lesser importance than The Gospel as Revealed to Me

 

                                                

Feb. 22, 2025.  Doctrine of Faith reiterates that Valtorta's writings not supernatural but a literary production of hers.  Translation below from Google.


https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20250222_comunicato-scritti-valtorta_it.html



DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH Communiqué About the writings of Maria Valtorta:

 

    The Holy See often receives requests from both clergy and lay people for clarification regarding the position of the Church regarding the writings of Maria Valtorta, such as the work Il poema dell’Uomo Dio, today known as L’Evangelo come mi è stato svelato, and other publications. In this regard, it is reiterated that alleged “visions”, “revelations” and “communications” contained in the writings of Maria Valtorta, or in any case attributed to them, cannot be considered of supernatural origin, but must be considered simply literary forms used by the Author to narrate, in her own way, the life of Jesus Christ. In its long tradition, the Church does not accept the apocryphal Gospels and other similar texts as normative, as it does not recognize their divine inspiration, referring to the safe reading of the inspired Gospels. Vatican City, February 22, 2025

 

 
 














Monday, March 3, 2025

A Trumpian Pope?

The following article by Austin Ruse appeared on February 28 on the website of Crisis Magazine. It is entitled The Trumpian Pope.  It pretty much summarizes what I personally would like to see happen in the Church.  

 

      --------------------------------------------------------

 

A meme is making the rounds: a bull in a china shop has destroyed every plate, saucer, and cup. We are asked, “Is this what you voted for?” As a matter of fact, it is.   

 

It is also what I voted for in 2016. The problem in 2016 was that politicized Democrat Deep Staters in the FBI, DOJ, military, CIA, federal judiciary, and Congress were in that china shop and illegally prevented the bull from doing his work. And they were cheered on by a thoroughly corrupted gutter press.  

 

This time around, however, the bull has neutered and/or taken over all those agencies, including the media, and hired a lot of lesser bulls, but bulls who know precisely what to do. These bulls have a plan, and they are moving fast and breaking things, and, in the words of Pope Francis, making a mess.  

 

And as we pray for the Holy Father in his final agony, we wonder who the next pope will be and pray he will be a Trumpian pope, a bull in the china shop who will “make a mess.”  

 

What would this coming Trumpian pope do? 

 

Fire a lot of people, for starters. And don’t do it with a scalpel. Deep Staters everywhere know how to blunt the scalpel. No, the Trumpian pope must use the chain saw. Fire 50 percent of the people who work in the Vatican. Fire every head of every dicastery in Rome. Close half of them down. Do that in the first few weeks after the conclave.  Fire a lot of people, for starters. And don’t do it with a scalpel. Deep Staters everywhere know how to blunt the scalpel. No, the Trumpian pope must use the chain saw.Tweet This

 

Recreate the Pontifical Council for the Family the way it was created. Recreate the Pontifical Academy for Life in the way it was intended. 

 

The rise of Francis and “who am I to judge” gave courage to heterodox professors, especially on the gay thing at pontifical universities. They giddily identified themselves. We know who they are. Fire them all within days of the conclave.  

 

This will get a lot of attention. Ignore the shrieks from the usual suspects around the world. Proceed with your work with all due dispatch. 

 

There’s more, much more.  

 

Synodality? It’s over. Thanks for your work. 

 

Any bishops must be chosen from those ordained to the priesthood in the last 10-15 years.  

 

Abrogate the motu proprio that gutted personal prelatures, restoring the harmony and existence of personal prelatures as they existed when Francis became pope. Make the prelate of Opus Dei a bishop again.  

 

Immediately rehire the very talented holy men the pope fired, including and especially Cardinal Müller, Cardinal Burke, and Cardinal Sarah. Give Burke back his stipend and Roman apartment. Give them all their old jobs immediately.  

 

Take the boot off the neck of the Knights of Malta and Communion and Liberation.  

 

Immediately begin an investigation—inquisition?—into the homosexuals in the Vatican. Fire them. Laicize them. 

 

Turn your attention to the wider Church.  

 

Reestablish the Traditional Latin Mass everywhere. Everywhere. No priest needs permission. It is open to all priests and all dioceses.  

 

Immediately cancel Amoris Laetitia. Immediately cancel same-sex blessings. Immediately take “inadmissible” out of the catechism on the question of the death penalty. What did that mean anyway? Excommunicate a number of politicians who support abortion.   

 

While you are at it, cut the USCCB in half. Make it clear that the committees of the USCCB do not speak for the Church. The USCCB is not in the hierarchy. Let the bishops speak to us once or twice a year when they meet as a body.   

 

Expand the number of dioceses in the United States. We need 400 of them or more. How can a bishop be a shepherd to 500,000+ souls? For instance, four hundred would still be far fewer bishops per Catholic than in Italy.  

 

Close any office or program called “Justice and Peace.” Justice is good. Peace is good. But together, not so much.  

 

Institute an annual collection for pro-life. Make it two.  

 

Close some seminaries in the United States. Any whiff of the gay thing, or other heterodoxies, close them down. Send some of our seminarians to Africa. Bring 1,000 African priests to the United States.  

 

Fire every bishop who ignored credible reports of priest sex abuse. We all know of at least one who would qualify.  

 

I am out of breath just writing this. I wake up every morning in Trump’s America, and it’s Christmas every day. He fired the head of the Kennedy Center. Whoa! Who even thought of that? He appointed Dan Bongino as number two at the FBI. I don’t even like Dan Bongino, but it’s fantastic.  

 

What Trump understood was that there was a permanent bureaucracy lying in the deep weeds, waiting to stop any and all reforms. The only way to beat them is to move fast, flood the zone, make everything so fast and furious that they cannot catch their breath, cannot really mount a response. Make a mess.  

 

Who would be able to do such things? Who would be a Trumpian pope? I am not a prognosticator. Others are. We have a small pool of cardinals who would be considered. Maybe the conclave needs to go beyond the College of Cardinals. I don’t know, but whoever thought Trump would be president? Hardly anyone. Pick a bishop hardly anyone knows. Pick Msgr. Shea from University of Mary in North Dakota. Don’t know him? Look him up.   

 

I remember when the last conclave met. I was at a Holy See meeting at the U.N. when the white smoke rose. As we sat around a conference table, our phones started to buzz. I caught the eye of the Nuncio. We exchanged meaningful glances. Later, in the U.N. cafeteria, all the lefties were in a tizzy about who this Bergoglio might be. Early reports were that he was solid on gay and marriage.  

 

None of us were prepared for what happened. We spent years explaining the pope. “Well, he may have said something like that, but what he meant was….” Some of us gave up after a few years. I tried to adopt the role of a 13th-century peasant: There is a pope somewhere far off. I love and pray for him, but I don’t know what he does or says. I have my priest and my bishop.   

 

Many of us are still confused about certain things that happened under the reign of Francis. Do we really have to give religious assent to the scientific claim of “climate change?” How is it possible that something that was a sin on Monday—taking Communion in a sinful relationship—becomes perfectly fine on Tuesday? How is it possible that something perfectly fine on Monday—the death penalty—becomes a sin on Tuesday? None of this really affects me, but it is confusing.  

 

Pray for two things: That our beloved Pope Francis experiences a holy and happy death and is welcomed into the Beatific Vision. And pray for the coming of a Trumpian pope. 

 

Austin Ruse

Austin Ruse is a contributing editor to Crisis Magazine. He is president of the Center for Family and Human Rights in New York and Washington DC. He is the author of several books including, Under Siege: No Finer Time to be a Faithful Catholic (Crisis Publications). He can be reached at austinruse@c-fam.org.  

 

www.frankrega.com